People v. Lopez

268 A.D.2d 391, 700 N.Y.S.2d 838, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 A.D.2d 707

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J., on motion; Ira Globerman, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 17, 1997, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6V2 to 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony as the product of an illegal arrest was properly denied without a hearing. As the People argued in opposition to the motion, defendant failed to raise a factual issue as to probable cause (see, People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415).

Defendant failed to preserve his present challenge to testimony concerning the roles of the various participants in a typical street-level narcotics operation, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the limited expert testimony was relevant and carried no suggestion of a large scale narcotics conspiracy. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Ellerin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 268 A.D.2d 391, 700 N.Y.S.2d 838, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

268 A.D.2d 391 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendoza
624 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)