People v. Lopez

246 A.D.2d 671, 666 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D.2d 1053

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Minardo, J.), imposed December 20, 1996.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal his sentence was not valid (see, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283; People v McCaskell, 206 AD2d 547). We have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 246 A.D.2d 671, 666 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 671 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. McCaskell
206 A.D.2d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)