People v. Lopez

213 A.D.2d 496, 624 N.Y.S.2d 899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 A.D.2d 189

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered April 22, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prompt curative action of the trial court minimized any prejudicial effect of the prosecution witnesses’ inadvertent and indirect references to photographs (see, People v Windley, 181 AD2d 703; People v Green, 143 AD2d 768).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Narayan, 54 NY2d 106), or do not warrant reversal. Sullivan, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 213 A.D.2d 496, 624 N.Y.S.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Narayan
429 N.E.2d 123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Green
143 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Windley
181 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)