People v. Lewis

48 A.D.3d 483, 849 N.Y.S.2d 793
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [484]*484(Latella, J.), rendered August 8, 2005, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in granting the prosecutor’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror (see People v Rennie, 34 AD3d 504 [2006]; cf. People v Oliveri, 29 AD3d 330 [2006]).

The defendant’s challenges to allegedly prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor on summation and allegedly prejudicial questions on the defendant’s cross-examination are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the comments and questions complained of do not warrant reversal (see People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021 [2007]; People v Liu, 104 AD2d 1052 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lewis, 48 A.D.3d 483, 849 N.Y.S.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

48 A.D.3d 483 (People v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Inniss
88 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Tomlinson
67 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Rudd
62 A.D.3d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)