Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Inniss

People v. Inniss

88 A.D.3d 741, 930 N.Y.2d 469
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 741 (People v. Inniss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Inniss, 88 A.D.3d 741, 930 N.Y.2d 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The defendant’s contentions raised in point one of his brief are partially unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [742]*742[2]). In any event, those contentions do not warrant reversal (see People v Lewis, 48 AD3d 483, 484 [2008]; People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021 [2007]; see also People v Singh, 299 AD2d 498, 499 [2002]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wright
40 A.D.3d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Lewis
48 A.D.3d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Singh
299 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 741, 930 N.Y.2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-inniss-nyappdiv-2011.