People v. Rennie
This text of 34 A.D.3d 504 (People v. Rennie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered October 31, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The court did not err in granting the prosecutor’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror (see People v Shulman, 6 NY3d 1, 27-28 [2005]; People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751-752 [2002]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Anderson, 242 AD2d 489 [1997]).
The contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Miller, J.P, Ritter, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.3d 504, 823 N.Y.S.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rennie-nyappdiv-2006.