People v. King

27 A.D.3d 1160, 810 N.Y.S.2d 724
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Shirley Troutman, J), rendered February 5, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [4]). Contrary to the [1161]*1161contention of defendant, the record establishes that he validly waived his right to appeal (see generally People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, that general waiver encompasses his present challenge to County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 27 A.D.3d 1160, 810 N.Y.S.2d 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 1160 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez-Diaz
30 A.D.3d 1104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)