People v. King

14 A.D.3d 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 551
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 25, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 14 A.D.3d 624, 787 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

14 A.D.3d 624 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)