People v. King

3 A.D.3d 324, 769 N.Y.S.2d 884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered September 29, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The People presented identification testimony by two witnesses, the victim and a store clerk, both of whom had ample opportunity [325]*325to view defendant, and an accomplice who also testified against defendant.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 3 A.D.3d 324, 769 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

3 A.D.3d 324 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)