People v. King

146 A.D.2d 648, 538 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 451

This text of 146 A.D.2d 648 (People v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. King, 146 A.D.2d 648, 538 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), imposed October 22, 1987.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, a review of the record indicates that prior to imposing the resentence, the Supreme Court gave "due consideration to all available facts, and to the four principal objectives of criminal sanctions— deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution and isolation” (People v Sanchez, 131 AD2d 606, 608, lv denied 70 NY2d 717). Moreover, there is no basis in the record for appellate modification (see, People v Sanchez, supra, at 609). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sanchez
131 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.D.2d 648, 538 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-king-nyappdiv-1989.