People v. Bernard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bernard

213 A.D.2d 489, 624 N.Y.S.2d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 489 (People v. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bernard, 213 A.D.2d 489, 624 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered October 1, 1992, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and assault in the first degree under Indictment No. 1961/91, and attempted assault in the second degree under Superior Court Information No. 2258/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

[490]*490Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargains (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered October 1, 1992, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and assault in the first degree under Indictment No. 1961/91, and attempted assault in the second degree under Superior Court Information No. 2258/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

[490]*490Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargains (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 489, 624 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bernard-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack