People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. King

47 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9258

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 870 (People v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. King, 47 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered April 26, 1974, convicting the defendant of two counts of rape in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and possession of a weapon as a felony, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing that the judgment and commitment papers be amended to recite the conviction of possession to be a misdemeanor, and otherwise affirmed. The People concede that the conviction on the weapons charge was a misdemeanor conviction. Defendant was given a misdemeanor sentence on that count of the indictment. Modification of the judgment and commitment papers to reflect the crime as a misdemeanor is all that is necessary. We have reviewed the balance of defendant’s contentions and find them without merit. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered April 26, 1974, convicting the defendant of two counts of rape in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and possession of a weapon as a felony, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing that the judgment and commitment papers be amended to recite the conviction of possession to be a misdemeanor, and otherwise affirmed. The People concede that the conviction on the weapons charge was a misdemeanor conviction. Defendant was given a misdemeanor sentence on that count of the indictment. Modification of the judgment and commitment papers to reflect the crime as a misdemeanor is all that is necessary. We have reviewed the balance of defendant’s contentions and find them without merit. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-king-nyappdiv-1975.