People v. Steinman

44 A.D.2d 839, 356 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Steinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Steinman, 44 A.D.2d 839, 356 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In this case in which defendant was indicted for conspiracy [840]*840in the third degree, attempted bribery in the second degree and grand larceny in the second degree (Indictment No. S. P. O. K. 6-1973), by a Grand Jury empaneled for an Extraordinary Special and Trial Term appointed by executive order, pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 149 of the Judiciary Law, defendant Steinman has moved in this court, by permission granted by Mr. Justice J. Irwin Shapiro, an Associate Justice of this court, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 149 of the Judiciary Law, to dismiss the indictment and for other relief. Motion granted insofar as it is for pretrial discovery and inspection of Items Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 on pages 34 to 36, inclusive, of the affidavit of counsel of defendant in support of the order to show cause on this motion and otherwise denied (see concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Shapiro in Matter of Klein v. Murtagh, 44 A D 2d —• [decided herewith]). As respects Items Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Deputy Attorney-General Nadjari is directed to provide defense counsel with transcripts of all the recorded conversations or telephonic interceptions referred to therein and to allow him to listen to the tapes in his (Mr. Nadjari’s) office, at a mutually agreeable time, not later than 10 days before trial; and, with specific reference to Item No. 2, any “exempt” property included therein, within the meaning of CPL 240.10 (subd. 3), may be excised by Mr. Nadjari. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. King
48 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
People v. Shields
82 Misc. 2d 275 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
People v. Di Matteo
80 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 839, 356 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-steinman-nyappdiv-1974.