People v. Jenkins

17 Cal. 500
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1861·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

1. The principal obligor and his sureties are in no condition to question the regularity of the election of the principal, or his responsibility for acts done in an official capacity. The principal had at least the color of office by his appointment, and the bond estops him and his sureties signing it from denying his official character.

2. The point that an administrator on Brown’s estate should have been appointed and joined as defendant, is answered by the statute which makes official bonds joint and several.

3. The mere passiveness of the Board of Supervisors, in not bringing Brown (the principal) to a settlement, does not discharge him or his sureties.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jenkins, 17 Cal. 500 (Cal. 1861).

17 Cal. 500 (People v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Live Oak Lumber Co. v. Farr
153 P. 741 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Boone County Bank v. Byrum
56 S.W. 532 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)
Slater v. McAvoy
56 P. 49 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Holt County v. Scott
73 N.W. 681 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Price v. Scott
43 P. 634 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)
Moore v. Earl
27 P. 1087 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
People v. Huson
20 P. 369 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Bull v. Coe
18 P. 808 (California Supreme Court, 1888)