People v. James

2017 NY Slip Op 2814, 149 A.D.3d 869, 49 N.Y.S.3d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.3d 723
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 2017·No. 2015-07172·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered June 30, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145 [2014]). However, contrary to his contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 2017 NY Slip Op 2814, 149 A.D.3d 869, 49 N.Y.S.3d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2814 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)