People v. James

16 A.D.3d 598, 790 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 A.D.3d 774

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J), both rendered July 24, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 01-934 and attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 01-1140, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 16 A.D.3d 598, 790 N.Y.S.2d 893, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 598 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)