People v. James

294 A.D.2d 600, 742 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5650
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered December 16, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886). In any event, the prosecutor’s remarks were either fair response to defense counsel’s summation (see People v Stanley, 191 AD2d 732) or were harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of the defendant’s guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 294 A.D.2d 600, 742 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 600 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. James
64 A.D.3d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)