People v. James

304 A.D.2d 384, 756 N.Y.S.2d 749, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3880
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 272 A.D.2d 75

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered October 30, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing her, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s supplementary charge given in response to a note from the deliberating jury claiming an inability to reach a unanimous verdict is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the supplementary charge as a whole conveyed the proper principles, was sufficiently balanced, and was not coercive (see People v Ford, 78 NY2d 878 [1991]; People v Pagan, 45 NY2d 725 [1978]).

The record establishes that defendant’s predicate conviction was for a violent felony (see Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [c]; § 265.02 [4]) and contradicts her claim that she was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 304 A.D.2d 384, 756 N.Y.S.2d 749, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 384 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pagan
380 N.E.2d 299 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Ford
78 N.Y.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)