People v. Hyams

134 A.D.3d 687, 19 N.Y.S.3d 786
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2015·No. 2014-10944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated October 22, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s sole contention on appeal, that the assessment of points under risk factors 5 and 6 constituted improper double counting, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d 520 [2015]; People v Jones, 101 AD3d 836 [2012]; People v Fredlund, 38 AD3d 636 [2007]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d at 521; People v Caban, 61 AD3d 834, 835 [2009]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant as a level two sex offender (see People v Tineo-Morales, 101 AD3d 839 [2012]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hyams, 134 A.D.3d 687, 19 N.Y.S.3d 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 687 (People v. Hyams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dipilato
2017 NY Slip Op 7759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)