People v. Hyams

134 A.D.3d 687, 19 N.Y.S.3d 786
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 2015
Docket2014-10944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.D.3d 687 (People v. Hyams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hyams, 134 A.D.3d 687, 19 N.Y.S.3d 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated October 22, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s sole contention on appeal, that the assessment of points under risk factors 5 and 6 constituted improper double counting, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d 520 [2015]; People v Jones, 101 AD3d 836 [2012]; People v Fredlund, 38 AD3d 636 [2007]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Brown, 131 AD3d at 521; People v Caban, 61 AD3d 834, 835 [2009]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant as a level two sex offender (see People v Tineo-Morales, 101 AD3d 839 [2012]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dipilato
2017 NY Slip Op 7759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 687, 19 N.Y.S.3d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hyams-nyappdiv-2015.