People v. Howard

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Howard

305 N.W.2d 268, 104 Mich. App. 598, 1981 Mich. App. LEXIS 2823

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 1981

DocketDocket 49706

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 305 N.W.2d 268 (People v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Howard, 305 N.W.2d 268, 104 Mich. App. 598, 1981 Mich. App. LEXIS 2823 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinions

R. B. Burns, J.

Defendant was accused of driving the getaway car in connection with the perpetration of a robbery of Young’s Pharmacy in Albion, Michigan. Defendant denied any participation in the crime. He was tried by a jury and convicted on a charge of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797.

Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence of his prior conviction of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The trial court ruled that the prejudicial effect of this evidence would not outweigh its probative value as to defendant’s credibility; however, it further stated that because the element of assault in both the prior conviction and the armed robbery charge might cause confusion in the minds of the jurors the prosecutor would not be allowed to inquire into the nature of the prior conviction. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in [600]*600ruling that evidence of the prior unspecified felony conviction was admissible.

The Supreme Court in People v Van Dorsten, 409 Mich 942; 298 NW2d 421 (1980), entered an order and stated, "It is improper to impeach a defendant by telling the jury only of the existence of the unnamed prior felony convictions without providing the names of the offenses. It is the nature, rather than the fact, of a prior felony conviction which the jury is to use in its evaluation of credibility.”

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

C. J. Hoehn, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. B. Burns, J.

Defendant was accused of driving the getaway car in connection with the perpetration of a robbery of Young’s Pharmacy in Albion, Michigan. Defendant denied any participation in the crime. He was tried by a jury and convicted on a charge of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797.

Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence of his prior conviction of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The trial court ruled that the prejudicial effect of this evidence would not outweigh its probative value as to defendant’s credibility; however, it further stated that because the element of assault in both the prior conviction and the armed robbery charge might cause confusion in the minds of the jurors the prosecutor would not be allowed to inquire into the nature of the prior conviction. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in [600]*600ruling that evidence of the prior unspecified felony conviction was admissible.

The Supreme Court in People v Van Dorsten, 409 Mich 942; 298 NW2d 421 (1980), entered an order and stated, "It is improper to impeach a defendant by telling the jury only of the existence of the unnamed prior felony convictions without providing the names of the offenses. It is the nature, rather than the fact, of a prior felony conviction which the jury is to use in its evaluation of credibility.”

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

C. J. Hoehn, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 N.W.2d 268, 104 Mich. App. 598, 1981 Mich. App. LEXIS 2823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-howard-michctapp-1981.

Opinions

R. B. Burns, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack