People v. Hill

277 A.D.2d 971, 716 N.Y.S.2d 541, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11545
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in imposing a surcharge of 10% of the amount of restitution ordered rather than the 5% directed by Penal Law § 60.27 (8). The affidavit submitted by the director of the Probation Department fails to demonstrate “that the actual cost of the collection and administration of restitution” (Penal Law § 60.27 [8]) in this case exceeds 5% of the amount of restitution imposed. We therefore modify the judgment accordingly. (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Noonan, J.— Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 277 A.D.2d 971, 716 N.Y.S.2d 541, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 971 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Christie
285 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)