People v. Hill
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in imposing a surcharge of 10% of the amount of restitution ordered rather than the 5% directed by Penal Law § 60.27 (8). The affidavit submitted by the director of the Probation Department fails to demonstrate “that the actual cost of the collection and administration of restitution” (Penal Law § 60.27 [8]) in this case exceeds 5% of the amount of restitution imposed. We therefore modify the judgment accordingly. (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Noonan, J.— Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
277 A.D.2d 971 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.