People v. Hill

251 A.D.2d 4, 672 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 A.D.2d 309

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered November 22, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The courtroom was properly closed during the undercover detective’s testimony (see, People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436). The Hinton hearing testimony “established the necessary spatial and temporal relationship among the courthouse, the location of defendant’s arrest, and the anticipated geographic location of the undercover officer’s future investigative work” (People v Brown, 214 AD2d 438, 439, lv denied 86 NY2d 791). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 251 A.D.2d 4, 672 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 4 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
624 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Brown
214 A.D.2d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)