People v. Hill

216 A.D.2d 125, 629 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6562
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 198 A.D.2d 100

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered April 18, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s request to charge the defense of agency was properly denied. Where the undercover officer, a complete stranger, asked defendant if he was "open”, and, upon defendant’s reply, "Yes * * * how many [do] you want?”, placed an order with defendant for "Two”, and defendant immediately relayed the undercover’s order to the codefendant, [126]*126who completed the sale, there was no evidence whatsoever "indicative of a relationship with the buyer” (People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780, 783) warranting an agency charge. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 216 A.D.2d 125, 629 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 125 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Herring
632 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)