Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hill

People v. Hill

245 A.D.2d 388, 665 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D.2d 902 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered July 26, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing [389]*389sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (McGann, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The police conduct in this case was justified in its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each successive step in response to the circumstances presented (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234; People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541). Consequently, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 245 A.D.2d 388, 665 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 388 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Hicks
500 N.E.2d 861 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)