People v. Hill

265 A.D.2d 426, 697 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10211
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered April 13, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. The court’s adverse inference charge was an appropriate remedy for the People’s failure to timely comply with the defendant’s discovery demand (see, CPL 240.20 [1] [c]; 240.70 [1]; People v Cunningham, 189 AD2d 821, 822; People v Vargulik, 130 AD2d 530, 531).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 265 A.D.2d 426, 697 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 426 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Shahiem L.
2024 NY Slip Op 51389(U) (Kings Family Court, 2024)
People v. Norwood
279 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)