People v. Henry

210 A.D.2d 873, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Henry. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 A.D.2d 1061

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, supra). Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Henry, 210 A.D.2d 873, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 873 (People v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Garcia
555 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)