People v. Henry

186 A.D.2d 986, 590 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11508
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no evidence in the record of the suppression hearing to show that defendant’s arraignment was delayed for the purpose of depriving defendant of his right to counsel. Defendant is not entitled to a new hearing to present additional evidence, having had the opportunity at the first hearing to litigate that issue (see, People v Cofresi, 60 NY2d 728). Moreover, any delay in the arraignment was justified in light of the ongoing murder investigation (see, People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079; People v Barker, 168 AD2d 211, lv denied 77 NY2d 875).

We have examined the other issues raised by defendant and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Henry, 186 A.D.2d 986, 590 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 986 (People v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Santiago
289 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. McCall
248 A.D.2d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Sampson
173 Misc. 2d 740 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)