People v. Henry

204 A.D.2d 1036, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Henry. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 A.D.2d 1061

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We disagree (see, People v Rivera, 71 [1037]*1037NY2d 705, 708-709; People v Jackson, 70 NY2d 768, 769). Defendant’s contention concerning prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County-Court, Burke, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Henry, 204 A.D.2d 1036, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 1036 (People v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jackson
514 N.E.2d 1369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)