People v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Headley

289 A.D.2d 341, 734 N.Y.S.2d 491, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11956

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 2001·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), both rendered January 24, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 3352/98, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 2591/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his claim that his sentences are excessive (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), both rendered January 24, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 3352/98, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 2591/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his claim that his sentences are excessive (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

People v. Headley, 289 A.D.2d 341, 734 N.Y.S.2d 491, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

289 A.D.2d 341 (People v. Headley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related