People v. Clancy
24 A.D.3d 686, 805 N.Y.S.2d 523
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), rendered September 9, 2003, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Headley, 289 AD2d 341 [2001]). Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Clancy, 24 A.D.3d 686, 805 N.Y.S.2d 523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).
24 A.D.3d 686 (People v. Clancy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sanchez
33 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Wilson
28 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)