People v. Hull

300 A.D.2d 411, 751 N.Y.S.2d 747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2002·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered September 25, 2000, convicting him of criminal mischief in the second degree and criminal mischief in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not demonstrate that the defendant sought to withdraw his plea of guilty before he was sentenced so as to preserve his claim that his plea was not intelligently, voluntarily, and knowingly made (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Nieves, 289 AD2d 342). Further, the defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appel[412] late review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Headley, 289 AD2d 341; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hull, 300 A.D.2d 411, 751 N.Y.S.2d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 411 (People v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Luster
45 A.D.3d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Dixon
41 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Silent
37 A.D.3d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Mitchell
22 A.D.3d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Matos
21 A.D.3d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Scott
21 A.D.3d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)