People v. Harris

2 A.D.3d 267, 768 N.Y.S.2d 330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D.2d 980

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered November 7, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s charge clearly conveyed the difference between [268]*268the People’s burden of proving defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and defendant’s burden of proving his affirmative defense of duress by a preponderance of the evidence (see People v Zito, 299 AD2d 569 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 621 [2003]; People v Balance-Soler, 298 AD2d 927 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 555 [2002]; see also People v Dory, 59 NY2d 121, 129 [1983]).

We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 2 A.D.3d 267, 768 N.Y.S.2d 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 267 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dory
450 N.E.2d 673 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Balance-Soler
298 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)