People v. Harris

282 A.D.2d 471, 722 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D.2d 775

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the [472]*472Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), imposed June 11, 1999, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed if he failed to comply with the conditions of his plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence was excessive (see, People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489). Bracken, P. J., O’Brien, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 282 A.D.2d 471, 722 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 471 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Moissett
564 N.E.2d 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Miles
268 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)