People v. Harris

261 A.D.2d 237, 688 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 959

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered October 23, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s jury instruction on the definition of burglary is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that in this case involving unlawful entry and not unlawful remaining, the court’s erroneous references to unlawful remaining could not have misled the jury (see, People v Ray, [238]*238254 AD2d 189, lv denied 92 NY2d 985). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 261 A.D.2d 237, 688 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 237 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ray
254 A.D.2d 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)