People v. Harris

257 A.D.2d 410, 683 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 39
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 959

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered May 23, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years and 71Vr2 to 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was provided with a reasonable opportunity to testify before the Grand Jury. As the record sufficiently shows, on the first date scheduled for his testimony, he refused to be produced (see, People v Turner, 227 AD2d 120). Although the matter was adjourned and his attorneys did not timely appear on the adjourned date, this did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel warranting dismissal of the indictment (People v Wiggins, 89 NY2d 872).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 257 A.D.2d 410, 683 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 39 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

257 A.D.2d 410 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wiggins
675 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Turner
227 A.D.2d 120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)