People v. Hamilton

173 A.D.2d 642
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered December 17, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We find that when considered as a whole, trial counsel’s performance was sufficiently competent to satisfy the defendant’s constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Since the defendant failed to object to the closure of the courtroom at trial when the undercover officer testified, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Scott, 134 AD2d 379; People v Boyd, 64 AD2d 668). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hamilton, 173 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

173 A.D.2d 642 (People v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diaz
265 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Batista
212 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)