People v. Hamilton

150 A.D.2d 490, 540 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hamilton. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 A.D.2d 395

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), rendered November 8, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the verdict was repugnant has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048). Moreover, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hamilton, 150 A.D.2d 490, 540 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 490 (People v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stahl
425 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)