People v. Hamilton
This text of 150 A.D.2d 490 (People v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), rendered November 8, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the verdict was repugnant has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048). Moreover, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 A.D.2d 490, 540 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hamilton-nyappdiv-1989.