People v. Green

44 A.D.3d 635, 841 N.Y.S.2d 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defen[636]*636dant from a determination of the County Court, Suffolk County (Creced, J.), dated March 8, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the determination is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender (see People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880 [2007]; People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level (see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403 [2005]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Dillon, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 44 A.D.3d 635, 841 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 635 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Imperato
45 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)