People v. Grant

179 A.D.2d 776
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 A.D.2d 170

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Hernandez, 71 NY2d 233, 245; People v Vailes, 150 AD2d 406). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 179 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 776 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Alvino
519 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Vailes
150 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)