People v. Grant

148 A.D.2d 632, 540 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 1989·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kriendler, J.), rendered September 30, 1986, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

None of the defendant’s claims of error with regard to the allegedly prejudicial remarks made by the prosecutor during summation are preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953). Nor was the defendant deprived of a fair trial by those comments of which he now complains (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, affd 65 NY2d 837).

Finally, the sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 148 A.D.2d 632, 540 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

148 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walden
162 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Paris
159 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Ruiz
155 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)