People v. Grant
This text of 161 A.D.2d 664 (People v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered December 8, 1986, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.
The trial court erred in permitting the People to elicit, over timely objections, trial testimony regarding the side-by-side photographic identification of the defendant by a prosecution witness (see, People v Caseria, 19 NY2d 18; see also, People v Lindsay, 42 NY2d 9; People v Osgood, 89 AD2d 76). Inasmuch as the defendant raised a substantial issue as to identification at trial, we cannot consider the error harmless (see, People v Osgood, supra), and a new trial is warranted.
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 A.D.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grant-nyappdiv-1990.