People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fuller

15 A.D.3d 152, 789 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 152 (People v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fuller, 15 A.D.3d 152, 789 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J., at hearing; Roger S. Hayes, J., at plea and sentence), rendered July 18, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal posses[153]*153sion of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The police were, at the very least, entitled to detain defendant in order to issue a summons for violation of the Open Container Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 10-125 [b]). The officer’s action of placing his arm on defendant’s back, at waist level, to guide him toward the police car was incidental to such detention and did not constitute a frisk (see People v Chin, 192 AD2d 413 [1993], lv denied 81 NY2d 1071 [1993]). We also note that defendant had been uncooperative in that he failed to comply with the officer’s requests (see People v Bothwell, 261 AD2d 232 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1026 [1999]). When the officer felt what he recognized to be a firearm at defendant’s waist, he was justified in arresting him for weapon possession. Concur — Buckley, EJ., Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J., at hearing; Roger S. Hayes, J., at plea and sentence), rendered July 18, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal posses[153]*153sion of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The police were, at the very least, entitled to detain defendant in order to issue a summons for violation of the Open Container Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 10-125 [b]). The officer’s action of placing his arm on defendant’s back, at waist level, to guide him toward the police car was incidental to such detention and did not constitute a frisk (see People v Chin, 192 AD2d 413 [1993], lv denied 81 NY2d 1071 [1993]). We also note that defendant had been uncooperative in that he failed to comply with the officer’s requests (see People v Bothwell, 261 AD2d 232 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1026 [1999]). When the officer felt what he recognized to be a firearm at defendant’s waist, he was justified in arresting him for weapon possession. Concur — Buckley, EJ., Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 152, 789 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fuller-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack