People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fuller

294 A.D.2d 282, 741 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5545

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.D.2d 282 (People v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fuller, 294 A.D.2d 282, 741 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy Webber, J.), rendered June 1, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sodomy in the first and third degrees, sexual abuse in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior sex crime. The current and prior crimes shared the same distinctive modus operandi, and the probative value of the prior crime on the issue of identity, which was one of several issues raised by defendant at trial, outweighed its prejudicial effect (see, People v Beam, 57 NY2d 241, 250-253). In both crimes defendant employed a highly particularized method of approaching his victims and lining them back to his apartment, where he would sexually assault them. Slight differences between the crimes did not render the testimony regarding the prior crime inadmissible (id.). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy Webber, J.), rendered June 1, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sodomy in the first and third degrees, sexual abuse in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior sex crime. The current and prior crimes shared the same distinctive modus operandi, and the probative value of the prior crime on the issue of identity, which was one of several issues raised by defendant at trial, outweighed its prejudicial effect (see, People v Beam, 57 NY2d 241, 250-253). In both crimes defendant employed a highly particularized method of approaching his victims and lining them back to his apartment, where he would sexually assault them. Slight differences between the crimes did not render the testimony regarding the prior crime inadmissible (id.). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 282, 741 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fuller-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack