People v. Chin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chin

192 A.D.2d 413, 596 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 413 (People v. Chin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chin, 192 A.D.2d 413, 596 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J., at Mapp hearing; Patricia Williams, J., at plea and sentence) rendered June 5, 1990, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the seizure of a gun from his person must be suppressed on the basis of the court’s ruling which granted suppression as to his codefendant is without merit. The police officers, on anti-crime patrol, were specifically investigating a group of men connected with armed robberies, one of whose description closely matched that of defendant. Defendant and his companions, who were followed by police, had been acting in a manner which alerted police suspicions. The subject officer also was aware that his partner had just removed a gun from one of the men, leaving this officer to face four men all of whom he assumed to be armed. The officer directed the four men to stand against the wall. Defendant was recalcitrant. The officer placed his hand on defendant’s back only to move him along. In so doing, he felt the outline of a gun in the small of defendant’s back. This officer, acting in furtherance of his common-law right of inquiry, had a right to assure his own safety.

In cases where an officer, in furtherance of his common-law right of inquiry, had valid concerns for personal safety, we have permitted such minimal intrusions (People v Yates, 176 AD2d 442, lv denied 79 NY2d 834; People v Brimmage, 161 AD2d 379, lv denied 76 NY2d 853; People v Gutierrez, 129 AD2d 463, appeal dismissed 70 NY2d 782; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526). We adhere to the same principle in the present case. Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J., at Mapp hearing; Patricia Williams, J., at plea and sentence) rendered June 5, 1990, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the seizure of a gun from his person must be suppressed on the basis of the court’s ruling which granted suppression as to his codefendant is without merit. The police officers, on anti-crime patrol, were specifically investigating a group of men connected with armed robberies, one of whose description closely matched that of defendant. Defendant and his companions, who were followed by police, had been acting in a manner which alerted police suspicions. The subject officer also was aware that his partner had just removed a gun from one of the men, leaving this officer to face four men all of whom he assumed to be armed. The officer directed the four men to stand against the wall. Defendant was recalcitrant. The officer placed his hand on defendant’s back only to move him along. In so doing, he felt the outline of a gun in the small of defendant’s back. This officer, acting in furtherance of his common-law right of inquiry, had a right to assure his own safety.

In cases where an officer, in furtherance of his common-law right of inquiry, had valid concerns for personal safety, we have permitted such minimal intrusions (People v Yates, 176 AD2d 442, lv denied 79 NY2d 834; People v Brimmage, 161 AD2d 379, lv denied 76 NY2d 853; People v Gutierrez, 129 AD2d 463, appeal dismissed 70 NY2d 782; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526). We adhere to the same principle in the present case. Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 413, 596 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chin-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack