People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Campbell

290 A.D.2d 373, 737 N.Y.S.2d 73, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 822

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 373 (People v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Campbell, 290 A.D.2d 373, 737 N.Y.S.2d 73, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), entered June 29, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Evidence establishing that defendant entered a youth center by taking advantage of the fact that workers propped open a door that normally was kept locked, requiring admittance by buzzer, and that while inside defendant stole a stereo, hid in a darkened meter room and falsely claimed to be part of the cleaning crew, warranted the inference that he entered the building with intent to steal and with knowledge that he had no license or privilege to enter (see, People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 278; People v White, 250 AD2d 500, lv denied 92 NY2d 952). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), entered June 29, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Evidence establishing that defendant entered a youth center by taking advantage of the fact that workers propped open a door that normally was kept locked, requiring admittance by buzzer, and that while inside defendant stole a stereo, hid in a darkened meter room and falsely claimed to be part of the cleaning crew, warranted the inference that he entered the building with intent to steal and with knowledge that he had no license or privilege to enter (see, People v Castillo, 47 NY2d 270, 278; People v White, 250 AD2d 500, lv denied 92 NY2d 952). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 373, 737 N.Y.S.2d 73, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-campbell-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack