People v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Friedlander

11 A.D.3d 556, 782 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12009

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 2004·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazillo, J.), rendered September 23, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed his claim that he was entitled to youthful offender treatment (see People v Boykin, 1 AD3d 524 [2003]). In any event, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender treatment (see People v Wallace, 246 AD2d 676 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazillo, J.), rendered September 23, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed his claim that he was entitled to youthful offender treatment (see People v Boykin, 1 AD3d 524 [2003]). In any event, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender treatment (see People v Wallace, 246 AD2d 676 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

People v. Friedlander, 11 A.D.3d 556, 782 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

11 A.D.3d 556 (People v. Friedlander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related