People v. Simms
89 A.D.3d 1043, 933 N.Y.2d 558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763 [1993]; see also People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]; People v Hubbard, 288 AD2d 490, 490 [2001]; cf. People v Johnson, 14 NY3d 483, 486 [2010]). Prudenti, EJ., Rivera, Eng, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Simms, 89 A.D.3d 1043, 933 N.Y.2d 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 1043 (People v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Drammeh
100 A.D.3d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)