People v. Holland

91 A.D.3d 672, 935 N.Y.2d 899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 A.D.3d 672 (People v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holland, 91 A.D.3d 672, 935 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentencing court should have considered and determined whether to sentence him as a youthful offender (see People v Billings, 60 AD3d 961, 962 [2009]; People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]).

The ineffective assistance of counsel alleged by the defendant did not directly involve the negotiation of his plea of guilty or otherwise affect the voluntariness of the plea. Accordingly, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim (see People v Jones, 89 AD3d 1037 [2011]; People v Sorino, 82 AD3d 911 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Drammeh
100 A.D.3d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Franko
98 A.D.3d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 672, 935 N.Y.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holland-nyappdiv-2012.