People v. Fox

104 A.D.3d 789, 960 N.Y.S.2d 330
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 2013·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Brennan, J.), imposed June 23, 2011, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on March 27, 2003.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required pe[790]*790riod of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy or due process clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-633 [2011]; People v Hsu, 97 AD3d 603 [2012]; People v Dolberry, 95 AD3d 1357 [2012]). Mastro, J.E, Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fox, 104 A.D.3d 789, 960 N.Y.S.2d 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 789 (People v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mercer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
People v. Williams
2024 NY Slip Op 00568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
DRAKE, WALLACE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
DAVIS, ANTWAN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Drake
126 A.D.3d 1382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Davis
126 A.D.3d 1398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)